Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese P.C.
Menu
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
    • Frederick B. Anderson
    • Katie L. Gallo
    • Jonathon P. Flaherty-Tarpey
    • J. Barton Goplerud
    • James R. Hinchliff
    • Tara L. Hofbauer
    • Andrew B. Howie
    • Gary W. Kendell
    • Michael P. Mallaney
    • Brian O. Marty
    • Eugene L. Nassif
    • Thomas W. Polking
    • Noah H. Ridgway
    • Peter J. Rolwes
    • Steven H. Shindler
    • Ryan E. Weese
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Personal Injury
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Litigation
    • Class Action Lawsuit
    • Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
    • Appeals
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Make A Payment
Home > Family Law » Child Custody » Dealing with Difficult Exes? Get Them Charged with Contempt.
Dealing with Difficult Exes? Get Them Charged with Contempt.

Blog Categories

  • Appeals (2)
  • Bankruptcy (1)
  • Business Law (2)
  • Class Action Lawsuit (1)
  • Family Law (9)
    • Alimony (3)
    • Child Custody (6)
    • Child Support (2)
    • Divorce (8)
  • Latest (19)
  • Litigation (5)
  • Personal Injury (3)
    • Car Accidents (2)
  • Real Estate (1)

Contact Our Office Today!

Dealing with Difficult Exes? Get Them Charged with Contempt.

April 15, 2016
Tags: Contempt, court order, Divorce, Separated
Filed in: Child Custody, Child Support, Divorce, Family Law

Written by “>Ryan E. Weese

In the practice of family law, coming to a final resolution represents only part of the battle. So many times clients will ask, “How do I make sure my ex follows through with our agreement?”, “My ex hasn’t followed any of our agreements so far, he’s only going to follow a court order.”, and “How can I ensure she lets me have the kids for my court ordered time with the children?”.

These clients all crave certainty and finality to their dispute. No attorney can guarantee 100{ed08d0f78e69b7ff4b50918def2f0ae669f005ed98ac6fec33294c8e8202ec0b} compliance with a court order, but we do have remedies for non-compliance. That remedy comes in the form of “contempt” — more legally referred to as an Application for Order for Rule to Show Cause.

Let’s take a custody case as an example. Mom and Dad enter into a final stipulation setting forth the custody, visitation and support provisions regarding their children. The stipulation becomes a court order by way of a final decree. We now have the law of the case established. But, one of the parties fails to abide by the terms of the decree. That violation could be for a number of things- failure to pay child support; failure to provide the non-custodial parent with visitation; failure to return the children timely, etc.

To find a party in contempt, a court must set the matter for a hearing and determine, after taking testimony and receiving exhibits, whether or not a party failed to comply with a court order, had a duty to obey the court order, and willfully failed to perform that duty. This process is what’s referred to as quasi-criminal so the constitutional provisions that protect those alleged of committing a crime apply. A person alleged to be in contempt most likely has the right to be advised of the charges against him; be given an opportunity to defend themselves; be represented by counsel; and to testify and call witnesses in their defense. The person seeking to prove the contempt must meet the high burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt. The alleged violator’s behavior must be willful, intentional and deliberate. Accidental, or behavior out of the contemnor’s control, probably won’t suffice for a finding of contempt

The court has many punishments available, should it find an individual in contempt. Those remedies include punitive sanctions such as a thirty (30) day jail sentence for each offense, the payment of attorney fees, the equivalent of a modification of the current order, and the ability to generally make the victim whole. These are powerful tools the court can utilize depending on the nature of the violation, the severity of the conduct, and the necessity to correct the contemnor’s behavior.

Although contempt proceedings are never a slam-dunk, when a party violates an order of the court, the court has an interest in upholding its own orders. A judge doesn’t enter orders believing individuals are free to disregard their mandate. When appropriate under the law, courts will enforce their orders and punish those who willfully disobey.



5015 GRAND RIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100
WEST DES MOINES, IA 50265
515-223-4567
515-223-8887

Get directions with Google Maps

Online Payment

Privacy Policy | Legal Disclaimer | Copyright © 2022, Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese P.C., All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The firm does not guarantee the confidentiality of any communications sent by e-mail or through its website, or left in voicemail messages on firm telephones. Unsolicited information and material may not be treated as confidential and will not be protected by any attorney-client privilege and may be unsecured. Accessing or using this website does not create a attorney-client relationship. Although the use of the web site may facilitate access to or communications with members of the firm by e-mail or voicemail, receipt of any such communications or transmissions by any member of the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship, unless our firm formally agrees to represent you in writing. Additionally, the information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.