Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese P.C.
Menu
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
    • Frederick B. Anderson
    • Katie L. Gallo
    • Jonathon P. Flaherty-Tarpey
    • J. Barton Goplerud
    • James R. Hinchliff
    • Tara L. Hofbauer
    • Andrew B. Howie
    • Gary W. Kendell
    • Michael P. Mallaney
    • Brian O. Marty
    • Eugene L. Nassif
    • Thomas W. Polking
    • Noah H. Ridgway
    • Peter J. Rolwes
    • Steven H. Shindler
    • Ryan E. Weese
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Personal Injury
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Litigation
    • Class Action Lawsuit
    • Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
    • Appeals
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Make A Payment
Home > Appeals » Association Restrictive Covenants and This Little Piggy
Association Restrictive Covenants and This Little Piggy

Blog Categories

  • Appeals (2)
  • Bankruptcy (1)
  • Business Law (2)
  • Class Action Lawsuit (1)
  • Family Law (10)
    • Alimony (3)
    • Child Custody (6)
    • Child Support (2)
    • Divorce (8)
  • Latest (19)
  • Litigation (5)
  • Personal Injury (3)
    • Car Accidents (2)
  • Real Estate (1)

Contact Our Office Today!

Association Restrictive Covenants and This Little Piggy

December 19, 2016
Filed in: Appeals, Business Law, Litigation

Written by Fred Anderson

The following is not our firm’s case, but is typical of ones we become involved in.

Lake Forest Property Owners Association v. Regina Gebauer and Taylor (Ala. App Court) The question the Court was asked to answer was whether a pig was livestock or a pet? The Association sued Gebauer claiming a 135 pound Vietnamese potbellied pig violated the neighborhood’s restrictions on livestock and constituted a nuisance or inconvenience to neighbors. The lower court ruled Taylor (the pig) constituted a nuisance and was livestock and should be banned. The appellate court found Taylor didn’t smell, didn’t wander outside the yard and didn’t make noise (except for an oink oink here and an oink oink there). Taylor’s expert (a veterinarian) testified that potbellied pigs do not fit veterinarians definition of livestock animals raised for consumption. The Court found Taylor was not livestock and not a nuisance.

Results of the case:

(1) This is one little pig that didn’t go to market; and
(2) Taylor’s attorney can now claim he truly brought home the bacon.

Association Restrictive Covenants bind the members of the Association. Covenants are necessary for the protection of the members and their property setting up standards and rules for the community. When questions arise, as they often do, about the interpretation or meaning of the Association covenants, courts generally rely on contract law to interpret the Covenants. Litigation, as is illustrated above, often becomes necessary to find out what the meaning is and what to do.

As condo and townhouse developments become more popular, clients and associations are calling attorneys with more questions and issues caused by Covenants. If agreement cannot be reached to resolve the issue, litigation or arbitration is used to get a resolution.

It is always good advice to review the Covenants prior to purchasing a condo or townhouse because there may be restrictions that you cannot live with, i.e. no fence allowed when you need or want a fence in your yard, not allowed to plant certain plants or vegetation, not allowed to conduct a business, or even not allowed to have the pet you want. Our firm invites questions about these and your issues. We know how frustrating it can be when you buy the place of your dreams and you can’t have “this little Piggy.”

Our firm represents both Associations and Members of Associations. Sometimes controversies arise between them concerning the Association Restrictive Covenants. Our firm handles such controversies.



5015 GRAND RIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100
WEST DES MOINES, IA 50265
515-223-4567
515-223-8887

Get directions with Google Maps

Online Payment

Privacy Policy | Legal Disclaimer | Copyright © 2023, Shindler, Anderson, Goplerud & Weese P.C., All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The firm does not guarantee the confidentiality of any communications sent by e-mail or through its website, or left in voicemail messages on firm telephones. Unsolicited information and material may not be treated as confidential and will not be protected by any attorney-client privilege and may be unsecured. Accessing or using this website does not create a attorney-client relationship. Although the use of the web site may facilitate access to or communications with members of the firm by e-mail or voicemail, receipt of any such communications or transmissions by any member of the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship, unless our firm formally agrees to represent you in writing. Additionally, the information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.